Research, evaluation & learning
Rigorous evidence to understand what works, inform investment and strengthen program delivery.
Talk to our teamRigorous evidence to understand what works, inform investment and strengthen program delivery.
Talk to our teamRigorous evidence to understand what works, inform investment and strengthen program delivery.
Evaluation is strongest when it starts with the decisions it needs to inform. We use mixed-methods approaches to explore program relevance, coherence, effectiveness, efficiency, impact and sustainability, while keeping conclusions proportionate to the design.
Baseline and endline studies, participatory inquiry and field quality checks help connect patterns in the data with the experiences of the people involved. Learning is translated into prioritised recommendations rather than treated as an appendix to reporting.

Our team brings together climate, social research, evaluation and environmental expertise. We select methods to match the question rather than applying a standard package to every context.
We begin by understanding the purpose of the work, existing information, stakeholder needs and the decisions that will use the findings. This shapes a proportionate and locally relevant research design.
Participatory methods create space for different community perspectives. Informed consent, gender and social inclusion, and careful handling of participant information are built into the process.
Evidence is reviewed across sources, with technical quality checks and discussion of emerging findings. We distinguish observations, interpretations and recommendations, and explain uncertainty.
Outputs are structured around practical decisions: clear findings, prioritised recommendations and accessible presentations that help stakeholders use the evidence.
Bring your climate, research or resilience challenge to our team.
Start a conversation